Bobbi-Jo Dow Baker

➡️ Read this week's dashboard:https://bit.ly/4oXYPjv➡️ Subscribe to get future dashboards delivered straight to your inbox:https://bit.ly/43LmECU...more...morepublic_profile__posts108CopyLinkedInFacebookXNo more next contentSlide to item 1Slide to item 2Slide to item 3Slide to item 4Slide to item 5Slide to item 6Slide to item 7Slide to item 8Slide to item 9Bobbi-Jo Dow Baker commented on a post2wI think it will come...eventually.Bobbi-Jo Dow Baker commented on a post2wBest wishes to your beautiful daughter!Bobbi-Jo Dow Baker commented on a post3wAll the best, Gary.No more previous contentBobbi-Jo Dow Bakerliked thisReport this postBobbi-Jo Dow Baker liked thisCox & PalmerCox & Palmer2wBobbi-Jo Dow Baker liked thisWe're proud to celebrate the appointment of two Partners in our Halifax office,Amy MacGregor, K.C.andHarry Thurlow, K.C., to the King's Counsel. Congratulations on this well‑deserved honour! You both continue to make our Firm and the Nova Scotia legal community proud:https://lnkd.in/eMdHKeEGpublic_profile__reactions13515 CommentsCopyLinkedInFacebookXBobbi-Jo Dow Bakerliked thisReport this postBobbi-Jo Dow Baker liked thisCommunity Legal InformationCommunity Legal Information2wBobbi-Jo Dow Baker liked thisOur Executive Director, Ellen Mullally, is in Ottawa this week as one of the representatives of thePublic Legal Education Association of Canada (PLEAC)to meet with members of parliament, the senate, and other key decision makers in the civil service. Frédérick Roussel -ÉducaloiMPSean CaseyJeff Surtees -Centre for Public Legal Education AlbertaEllen Mullally -Community Legal Informationpublic_profile__reactions16CopyLinkedInFacebookXBobbi-Jo Dow Bakerliked thisReport this postBobbi-Jo Dow Baker liked thisAngela MarinosAngela Marinos1moBobbi-Jo Dow Baker liked thisTomorrow, I'll be appearing as an intervener before theSupreme Court of Canada | Cour suprême du Canadain the R v. A.M. appeal, involving whether s. 276 of the Criminal Code applies to human trafficking and sexual services offences. Section 276 precludes the admissibility of evidence of prior sexual activity to infer that the complainant was more likely to have consented or is less worthy of belief.